Sunday, December 20, 2009

What is Really Going On

Great article - pay particular attention to the third paragraph from the end

From The Bulletin, Philadephia's Family Newspaper

Obama And His Appointees Dismantling US




By HERB DENENBERG, For The Bulletin
Saturday, December 19, 2009
President Barack Hussein Obama is proceeding to destroy America and has opened up a six-front war to do so:

1. He has a Democratic controlled Congress that is willing to rubber-stamp his wildest schemes, without even reading them…as we’ve already seen. The Democratic Party is now aiding and abetting the demeaning and destruction of America and has become the voice of leftist extremism. The moderates have disappeared or been transformed, issuing only occasional squeaking and whining before following the liberal party line drawn by Mr. Obama. Where have all the Democratic moderates gone?

2. Mr. Obama has immense executive authority, which he has already used to damage the country. One notable example is his decision to try terrorists in New York City, thereby giving the terrorists the premier platform to broadcast their propaganda and recruit Islamic radicals to their cause. Another example is cap and trade by fiat of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), rather than Congressional action.

3. He is filling the White House, the executive branch and the court system with an army of radicals, socialists, Communists, Marxists, Maoists, and America-haters. The most outrageous example was Van Jones, the avowed Communist and believer that 9/11 was an American plot fashioned by President George W. Bush. Van Jones wasn’t too much of an extremist for the White House; in fact, he was loved and respected as a key White House adviser, Valerie Jarrett publicly proclaimed at the time of his appointment. But, he was too extreme even for the mainstream media to cover-up and swallow. But, don’t kid yourself – extremists like that are the rule, not the exception in Mr. Obama’s world.

4. He stands ready to commit the U.S. to radical international treaties that will bleed away American sovereignty and commit the nation to destructive policies. Watch what happens in Copenhagen, and watch the directions of Mr. Obama in matters of international laws and treaties. He has made it obvious he is more interested in pleasing the international community than in protecting the citizens of America. Couple that with his penchant for bootlicking our enemies, apologizing for America, and kicking around and betraying our allies and you have a prescription for international disaster. Note the betrayal of Poland and Czechoslovakia by his withdrawal of missile defense from those two important allies. He did so to appease Russia, again bootlicking enemies while betraying allies.

5. Mr. Obama seems ready to do anything to achieve his ends, a la the formula of Saul Alinsky and his book Rules for Radicals. Alinsky believed the ends justify the means, and that means anything goes. Mr. Obama has demonstrated he is willing to lie, use fascist-style tactics to silent critics, and do what it takes to achieve his agenda. He has even expressed his disdain for the U.S. Constitution in his now infamous quote that civil rights litigation and adjudication went off track because it did not focus on redistribution. His comments, record, and policies show he believes in redistribution of wealth, and views capitalism, free markets and profit as all part of a tainted system that is unjust. One of his major priorities is “spreading the wealth around,” as he admitted to Joe the Plumber.

6. Finally, the mainstream media is sanitizing and covering up Mr. Obama’s worst excesses, as we’ve witnessed with major stories   either ignored or almost totally neglected. In recent months, the dishonest, fraudulent, and biased mainstream media virtually ignored Climategate, one of the great scientific scandals of history; the Acorn undercover scandal; and the Van Jones appointment, as well as a long list of other far-out radicals. The mainstream media has become an adjunct of the Obama plan to destroy America, as we know it.

 This column will focus on the wild leftist radicals that he is packing into the federal agencies and the unconstitutional czars he is filling up the White House with. I question, when America elects a president who spends over 20 years hanging around with terrorists, racists, bigots, anti-Semites, Communists, Marxists, and socialists, what kind of appointments do you think he’ll be making? And, when he packs the White House with such crazies, what kind of policies do you expect to be forthcoming?

For openers consider his latest appointment to the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC), the agency that adjudicates discrimination claims. Her name is Chai Feldblum, she is a professor at Georgetown University and is a most radical homosexual activist. She has advocated polygamy and has said that “sexual liberty” trumps the Constitutional right to “religious liberty.” Of course, she underwent what is called a confirmation conversation – trying unsuccessfully to lie out of previous positions. However, Bill Donohue of the Catholic League found her newfound moderation a total “farce.”

She is the primary author of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) now before both houses of Congress. The bill has been described by J. Matt Barber on the Renew America Web site as follows: “ENDA would force – under penalty of law – Christian, Jewish or Muslim business owners to hire people who unrepentantly choose to engage in homosexual or cross-dressing behaviors, despite the fact that these volitional behaviors are in direct conflict with every major world religion, thousands of years of history and uncompromising human biology. … It’s a direct assault on the inalienable rights of people of faith. It pits the government directly against the free exercise of religion and is, therefore, unconstitutional on its face.” Recall, this president has announced this is not a Christian nation, contrary to American history, a history he more often deplores than proclaims.

The Feldblum appointment is part of a larger effort to force the homosexual agenda on the American people, from the youngest school children on up. For the perfect example, take the safe-schools czar, Kevin Jennings. Here’s the way the Web site www.wordpress.com summarized his qualifications:

· A former schoolteacher

· A gay

· An advocate of promoting homosexuality in schools

· A former drug user

· Dislikes religion

· Failed to report an underage student who told him he had sex with an older man.

The views of Mr. Obama’s science and technology czar, Dr. John Holdren, are also bizarre. In the 1980s, in discussing population controls, he advocated compulsory abortion and sterilization as constitutional. No proposal is too extreme for the Obama team.

This radicalism pervades every corner of the White House and Mr. Obama’s appointments. Take Craig Becker, an Obama appointee to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). He was a union lawyer, who was associate general counsel of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). The SEIU is the union with close connections to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the corrupt group of community organizers best known for voter fraud and extortion and intimidation of lenders. Mr. Becker helped lay the groundwork for the Employee Fair Choice Act (EFCA). That is the proposed law that would do away with the secret ballot in union elections and would permit federally designated bureaucrats to determine employment terms if a union and employer did not reach a prompt agreement. This act is so blatantly anti-democratic that it is even opposed by a far-left liberal, George McGovern, former U.S. Senator and Democratic Party nominee for president.

Even if Congress won’t pass the EFCA, Mr. Becker believes he can get the wildly leftist Obama agenda established by rule making by the NLRB, thus eliminating the need for Congressional action. This is characteristic of the Obama administration – willing to implement the most radical measures without Congressional approval and rule by administrative diktat.

And Mr. Becker will have plenty of support from other top Obama appointees in the federal bureaucracy. There is Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, who was first elected to Congress in 2000, as the union candidate. For about 10 years in Congress, she had a perfect record of support for union proposals. And, she is likely to coddle unions and persecute employers as Secretary of Labor.

Secretary Solis has already announced her plan to give unions more power over employers and the economy. And, she has already started taking all controls off of union abuses. For example, her predecessor, Elaine Chao, took the responsibility of policing unions seriously. During her tenure, Ms. Chao obtained 929 convictions for corrupt union practices and recovered more than $93 million on behalf of union members (as reported in The American Spectator. The U.S. Labor Department unit that polices unions is the Office of Labor Management Standards (OLMS). Shortly after the union lapdog, Ms. Solis, took office, the Obama administration reported it was cutting OLMS’s budget by more than 9 percent. The American Spectator writes, “As a result, corrupt union bosses will have a much freer hand with which to bilk their members.”

That’s just a taste of what Mr. Obama is doing to the Department of Labor to make it an instrument of unionization and the union agenda. Two other appointments to The Department of Labor are Patricia Smith and Lorelei Boylan. Both have close ties to unions and while working for the New York State Department of Labor, they were in charge of a program in which New York state partners with unions and other liberal groups to police workplaces. The American Spectator writes, “But in practice empowering ‘regular people’ actually means that the government is deputizing unions to help police workplaces.” This is just another example of how the Obama administration seeks to control every aspect of the American economy and do so to favor their political supporters, in this case the unions. Given their way, American business will be run by union bosses and union thugs.

Another area where Mr. Obama seeks to impose government control is talk radio. There is Mark Lloyd, who was appointed to be associate general counsel and chief diversity officer of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). He is on record of favoring all kinds of regulation of talk radio, which would be designed to muzzle conservative talk radio. To show how extreme these Obama appointees are, consider Mr. Lloyd’s comments about the tyrant of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez. Mr. Lloyd went on record in support of Mr. Chavez who, among other things, is a sworn enemy of America: “In Venezuela, with Chavez, is really an incredible revolution – a democratic revolution.” There is a deadly Orwellian flavor to Mr. Obama and his appointees – a vicious tyrant is transformed into an instrument of “democratic revolution.”

The “Czars” are even more radical and even more out of control than members of the cabinet, who are subject to Senate confirmation. They can escape any Senate confirmation and, consequently, are viewed by some legal authorities as end-runs around the U.S. Constitution. Carol Browner, global warming (energy) czar, is typical. She is one of the leaders of the Socialist International and, as such, advocates “global governance” and maintains that developed nations must shrink their economy to help alleviate global warming. The czars and their threat to U.S. constitutional government are covered in detail in an article in Newsmax entitled “Czars: Never Elected. Never Confirmed. Too Powerful?”

Thomas Sowell, the brilliant conservative pundit, makes an important point for those who think these radical extremists somehow got into the White House because of a failure to properly vet them. Mr. Sowell writes, “Why should we assume Obama didn’t know what such people were like; he’s been associating with these kinds of people for decades. Nothing is more consistent with his pattern than putting such people in government – people who reject American values, and resent Americans and America’s influence in the world.”

Wake up America. We elected one of the most dangerous enemies of America and he now sits in the White House, filled with other enemies of America, relentlessly going about his task of destroying the country as we know it and as the Founding Fathers intended it. You better join the forces in opposition to Mr. Obama’s vision for America because if he continues unobstructed for three more years, it may then be too late to save it.

It’s later than you think. Mr. Obama can kill the economy and America with his version of ObamaCare standing by itself (See The Bulletin, “ObamaCare Spells Doom for America,” Dec. 6-12, and “Wake Up Before Obama Destroys America,” Dec. 13-19). And, he seems to be firing shots with machine-gun rapidity that have the potential to destroy our economy and our country. There’s some element of truth in talk show host Michael Savage’s assertion that we now have a dictatorship. With supermajorities in both houses of Congress and with seemingly inept Republican leadership, with free use of extra-Constitutional methods, i.e. czars, there seems to be no real checks and balances that should keep an out-of-control radical runaway president in check.

Even our Founders, political geniuses, still could not foresee and plan for the election to the White House of an America-hating radical, backed by supermajorities of the Democratic Party willing to follow him over the cliff to the destruction of America.

Herb Denenberg can be reached at advocate@thebulletin.us

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

A Sensible School District

The following email message was sent out by the Medina (Ohio) City Schools on the subject of the President's address to the Nation's school children. It reinforces the concept that decisions regarding schools are local issues, and should remain as such. This is a school system that certainly seems to take a common sense approach to educating their students. Pay special attention to the next to last paragraph - how refreshing that they teach the Constitution and basic civics. There are many school systems across our great Nation, and especially the children in their charge, that could benefit from the same common sense approach to education.


Dear Parents of Medina City Schools,

In case you haven't heard, President Obama intends to address the children of our great nation on Tuesday, September 8th at noon. As a district we will not be airing President Obama's speech or utilizing the supporting documents for the speech. While we believe his intentions are good, we will leave it to you, the parents, to determine if you wish to have your children view President Obama's speech.

While we sincerely respect the position of President of the United States, as an educational institution we must also respect the rights of a parent to make decisions for their children when it comes to politics. Many parents have called the District both in favor and against the speech being broadcast live to students. In order to minimize any controversy and the potential disruption of the educational process, we decided to leave it to parents to discuss or watch the speech with their children on their own time. Should you make the decision to view the speech with your child you can access it via an archived webcast at http://www.whitehouse.gov/ or http://www.ed.gov/.

The Medina City School District will teach your children to think critically and think for themselves. We will also teach children how to sift through all of the information that is available to them (political or not), decide between fact and fiction, and then understand the process for making an educated decision based on quality information. We will also continue to make sure that our students know and understand the branches of government and the Constitution of the United States. We believe that once they truly understand the Constitution they will then be able to make good political decisions on their own.

Thanks for your understanding on this matter and thank you for your ongoing support of the Medina City School District!

Sincerely,

Randy Stepp

Superintendent

Medina City Schools

Just as a footnote, the White House parsed their words well. While they may have been truthful in stating that the speech wouldn't be political, the President just couldn't resist his radical urges and, just like a good leftist, he couldn't help himself in a meeting with 40 high school freshmen before the speech ~ you know it, he pitched healthcare reform http://cnsnews.com/news/article/53712

What a pitiful excuse for a statesman.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

At the White House the other evening....

Tuesday evening at The White House, the President hosted the Ramadan shindig, or iftar, which was attended by many of the usual suspects and other Islamo-Facists. I checked out the guest list and couldn't figure out which folks were the representatives of the moderate Taliban factions. I did notice, however, the attendance of Imam Yahya Hendi, chaplain, Georgetown University. Isn't Georgetown Univeristy one of the premier Roman Catholic universities in America? Why the Imam? Oh, that's right.... also Jesuit. That might explain it.

As is so common in political speeches today, from both sides of the aisle, the speaker trots out human props, usually in person, as many were at the dinner, but in this case that would not be possible. He spoke of Army Spc. Kareem Khan, a soldier of the Muslim faith, killed in action in Iraq in August, 2007. He said, in part:

"Tonight, he's buried alongside thousands of heroes in Arlington National Cemetery. A crescent is carved into his grave, just as others bear the Christian cross or the Jewish star. These brave Americans are joined in death as they were in life -- by a common commitment to their country and the values that we hold dear."

Mr. President, don't pretend to share the committment to country and values this brave young American gave his life to defend. Your actions, speeches abroad, policies, and proposed policies are the antithesis of his committment and values, as well as those who have made the ultimate sacrifice before him. You and those with whom you choose to associate (and keep as your closest advisers) don't like his America, never have, and you're trying to fundamentally change it - and the Mob has noticed.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

The Lies The Opposition Is Telling

I maintain a dummy email account to receive mail from the opposition - the Democrats, Statists, Socialists and their ilk - so I can read what they say to their supporters. I go to their websites, sign up and the putrid debris arrives like clockwork. Here's a mailing I received about "The Mobs" from Jen O'Malley Dillon, Executive Director, Democratic National Committe:

5 facts about the anti-reform mobs

1. These disruptions are being funded and organized by out-of-district special-interest groups and insurance companies who fear that health insurance reform could help Americans, but hurt their bottom line. A group run by the same folks who made the "Swiftboat" ads against John Kerry is compiling a list of congressional events in August to disrupt. An insurance company coalition has stationed employees in 30 states to track where local lawmakers hold town-hall meetings.

2. People are scared because they are being fed frightening lies. These crowds are being riled up by anti-reform lies being spread by industry front groups that invent smears to tarnish the President's plan and scare voters. But as the President has repeatedly said, health insurance reform will create more health care choices for the American people, not reduce them. If you like your insurance or your doctor, you can keep them, and there is no "government takeover" in any part of any plan supported by the President or Congress.

3. Their actions are getting more extreme. Texas protesters brought signs displaying a tombstone for Rep. Lloyd Doggett and using the "SS" symbol to compare President Obama's policies to Nazism. Maryland Rep. Frank Kratovil was hanged in effigy outside his district office. Rep. Tim Bishop of New York had to be escorted to his car by police after an angry few disrupted his town hall meeting -- and more examples like this come in every day. And they have gone beyond just trying to derail the President's health insurance reform plans, they are trying to "break" the President himself and ruin his Presidency.

4. Their goal is to disrupt and shut down legitimate conversation. Protesters have routinely shouted down representatives trying to engage in constructive dialogue with voters, and done everything they can to intimidate and silence regular people who just want more information. One attack group has even published a manual instructing protesters to "stand up and shout" and try to "rattle" lawmakers to prevent them from talking peacefully with their constituents.

5. Republican leadership is irresponsibly cheering on the thuggish crowds. Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner issued a statement applauding and promoting a video of the disruptions and looking forward to "a long, hot August for Democrats in Congress."


It's time to expose this charade, before it gets more dangerous. Please send these facts to everyone you know. You can also post them on your website, blog, or Facebook page.

Now, more than ever, we need to stand strong together and defend the truth.
Well Jen, I'm posting it on my blog, but not for the reasons you want. "Defend the truth"?? As Jack once said "You can't handle the TRUTH"!!

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Are all Presidents treated equal?

Received this in an email today and thought I would share......

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics,
would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of Great Britian, a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos
of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and
tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have
approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent
"Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people
who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have
approved?

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de
Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth of May
(Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you
have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had misspelled the word advice would you have hammered
him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as “proof” of what a dunce
he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single
tree on “Earth Day”, would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush's administration had ok'd Air Force One flying low over
millions of people following by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing
widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually “got”
what happened on 9-11?

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter
installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have
laughed and said this is more proof of how he inept he is on his own and is
really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout
the Midwest with more people killed than in New Orleans, would you want it
made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and
incompetence?

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation,
even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have
approved?

If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken
more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10
years, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by
90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura
Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

So, tell me again, please, what is it about Obama that makes him so
brilliant, so impressive?

Can't think of anything?

Don't worry. He's done all this in 5 months. You'l l have three years and
seven months to come up with an answer.

And, oh, by the way...
When will we ever get to see Obama's birth certificate?!

What would have happened if George W. Bush had denied access to his birth records to the American people????

The State Run Media (thank you, Rush!) has been in the tank for this President since early in the election process. It's a clear abrogation of the responsibility that comes with their First Amendment rights.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Gun Slogans

About a week ago, a posting on Twitter posted asked everybody to post their favorite gun slogans. The following is a compilation of the resulting posts, but not necessarily all of them. Thanks to all the Tweeters who contributed, and if you have any additions, please let me know.

For real feminine protection, try a firearm
Blessed be the pessimist for he carries extra ammo
Armed women = polite men
Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6
I carry a gun because an empty holster just doesn't look as bad-ass
Because Paul Revere would have sounded real stupid yelling, "Hide in your cellar."
Because nobody ever tore a terrorist in half from two clicks out with a .50 caliber pepper spray.
I carry a gun because Cops are too heavy!
Guns, because what else am I supposed to do with all this ammunition?
Why Guns? Because the Founding Fathers said so, that's why!!
If God didn't want us to shoot stuff, he wouldn't have put things that need holes in them so far away.
Gun control has never been about guns. It's really about control.
When seconds count, the police are only minutes away
Guns don't kill people, OJ kills people
Guns, because I can
Guns, because your online stalker just found out where you live.
Guns, because a trebuchet just won't fit in an ankle holster.
ALL THE GUN CONTROL WE NEED WAS ENACTED IN 1791!
Guns, b/c by the time the cops arrive, all they can really do is investigate another statistic
"I like guns. If you own a gun, you don't have to work-out.." Chris Rock
Because an armed society is a polite society
Its the 2nd amendment because the first one is how you warn them
A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone
Free men do not ask permission to bear arms
I use a gun, because grenades are too expensive
Guns. For when those straggling houseguests can't take any other hint
Because I may not be happy to see you
Guns, because a Restraining Order is really just a piece of paper.
Because I need something else to cling to besides my Bible
Guns, because I refuse to become a Redneck Martyr.
Because I was the victim of Home invasion. I know.
Guns, because some people refuse accept the word "No" as an appropriate answer
I'm no expert, but if you want to hurt someone, it's a great place to start
Guns, the ultimate antidote for tyranny.
Guns. Because without the 2nd Amendment, the other 9 are meaningless.
Ready, aim... litigate? I don't think so
Guns, the Veto Of, By & For We The People
Guns, opening the minds of home intruders everywhere.
Guns, because Liberty is a terrible thing to waste
Democracy is 2 Wolves & a Sheep debating dinner. Liberty is the well-armed Lamb contesting the final vote.
Guns, because a liberal voting his conscience is a direct threat to your family's safety
Guns, because Battered Wive's Syndrome is no way to live your life
Because sometimes you're just not your brother's keeper
Guns, because MS13 sells drugs in your neighborhood.
Guns, because the Federal Government refuses to close the border.
Because sometimes people don't understand and I don't feel like explaining
Guns, because the lock was only designed to keep the honest man out
Guns, because stalkers prefer to drop by for a visit at 3 AM
Guns: John Wayne didn't carry no pepper spray.
Guns: Because Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Madison & company thought YOU should have a VETO too
When you really want to reach out and touch someone
Guns, because Mace loses effectiveness downwind
Guns...because Hitler would have disapproved.
Guns, when you prefer to say "No" from a safe distance.
Guns, because sometimes, that bumper-tap is no accident.
Guns, the original point and click interface
If you know a better way to turn brain into mist, we're all ears.
Clinical studies have shown a diet high in lead can decrease bad crime levels by up to 20%
Guns, because sometimes, DHS labels Constitutionalists as Extremists.
Four out of five voices in your head agree
Shotguns, making cross eyed people deadlier than ever before
Because some people just can't run fast enough to chase the bad guys down.
Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of a tighter grouping
Because John Wayne never carried a restraining order, pardner
Guns, because when it's them or Me. Me wins everytime.
If you're angry, calm down and take a deep breath. It helps your aim.
The most convenient place to store your bullets.
Guns, because this stuff is mine
I shoot, therefore I am . . . able to save my life and yours.
You've seen Deliverance, right? We're just sayin.
A Canadian is sort of like an American, but without the gun
Guns, cuz they make hot conservative babes even HOTTER!
Guns, because pitchforks & torches is sooo 18th century
Gun Control: Sight Alignment, Breath Control, Trigger Squeeze
Guns, when waterboarding just doesn't finish the job!
Guns, when simple words lack the required emphasis
A bullet to the head makes rapists dead
Sometimes, even Indiana Jones gets tired of using his bullwhip
Guns..Winning hearts and minds since the middle ages.
Because "Go ahead, make my day" doesn't sound nearly as cool if you're holding a crossbow
How else are you supposed to make grown men dance?
Guns, the real voice of the Silent Majority
Guns, because I have two attractive pre-teen daughters.
Cause Momma didn't raise no victims.
Guns. Just Guns. That's it.
Guns: because strangulation takes too much effort and time!
Guns: It's better to have and not need than to need and not have.
Guns, because some of us have short legs and just can't run as fast.
Because life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness hang in the balance.
Don't Run, You'll Just Die Tired: Sniper slogan
Four out of five politicians surveyed prefer unarmed, ignorant peasants
Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap, life is expensive
Double Tap, when you absolutely, positively have to ensure situational resolution
Charlton Heston says they would have saved Moses forty pairs of sandals
Give a criminal a tattoo that will never wear off.
How The West Was Won" wasn't about a bad poker hand